DOCUMENT COMPLIANCE

The filing of a petition or brief with the Supreme Court of the United States is unlike the process in any other court in the United States. Your document must conform to an 84-page rulebook, which specify a myriad of requirements. The failure to conform with the rulebook often leads to the rejection and non-docketing of the party’s case or documents. Nearly equally as bad, sometimes a filing can be accepted by the clerk of court, but the document looks substandard when reviewed by the Justices.

The Supreme Court Press provides a stress-free Supreme Court filing experience. The net of all of these requirements is that it is exceptionally difficult to execute, as well as time intensive and stressful.

This is just a short sample of the Supreme Court’s requirements:

Common Compliance Issues
Content Problems	Specific content that must be included, as well as content that should be omitted. The order of content. A specific manner of placing table of contents and authorities. Content that is disfavored for inclusion. Appendix requirements.
Jurisdictional and Legal Requirements	Unique methods of invoking jurisdiction depending on the origin of case and type of case. Specific items that must be included either in the appendix or by reference to invoke jurisdiction. Conflict of interest and ownership disclosures.
Formatting Requirements	Appendix formatting Fonts Spacing Margins Footnote formatting
Printing Requirements	Required paper quality Required cover stock and cover color Paper trimming Binding requirements
Service Requirements	Physical service requirement on the Court Physical service requirements on opposing counsel Electronic service Proof of service Certificate of Word Count

Note: The Supreme Court Press does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. If you need legal advice on a specific matter, please contact a lawyer. The Supreme Court Press Does not calculate legal deadlines. It is the client’s sole responsibility to manage and meet their deadlines.

Print Friendly

our services

The Supreme Court Press was a God send via Google. I jumped on the Internet and there you were. I knew nothing about printing and submitting a Supreme Court brief. The editor took my hand and lovingly guided me through the dense, legal forest. He answered all of my novice questions, gave positive feedback and friendly encouragement. All of us, in my case, could not be more happy to have run into the Supreme Court Press!
Wayne Anderson,

Our experience with Supreme Court Press has been Excellent. Someone has always been available for even the most the trivial questions. we received practical tips and great advice that i believe assisted in ourefforts to get certiorari. Supreme Court Press never presented the company as merely a printer. Supreme Court Press has provides us with a place to go for all of our needs relating to this petiton.
JOHN MILLER CARROLL,

Thank you. i'd also like to add, the Supreme Court Press, in my humble opinion, is a first rate operation. Our experience with them is that they are very knowledgeable about appellate court rules and extraordinarily professional.
ALEXANDRA SISKOPOLOUS,

I felt the editor process was amazing and i wish i could hire Supreme CourtPress for all of my briefs . . . with regard to the initial brief i feli that the help i received was way more than i expected. i expected formatting issues to arise but as far as the editing for content, and the suggestions that were made, i found them all to be extremely insightful and very helpful.
LAUREN SANDY,

The Supreme Court Press was more to us than just a printer. You helpedus step back from our passion-driven sense of purpose to right this wrong. Between edits and suggestions, we were able to step back andSupreme Court Press was like a silent senior partner that raised our level of performance.
PETER Q.JOHN,

We were impressed and totally satisfied with working with the supreme court press. It was liberating not to worry about the dozens of intricate formatting and procedural rules that must be followed before the supreme court will accept a filing. We could focus on developing persuasive arguments and explaining why a writ of certiorari should be granted.
ANN SHORT,

Expert Service at
the Supreme Court Press

our services

Telephone Number

Message Us Now

Address Location

Expert Service at the Supreme Court Press

DOCUMENT COMPLIANCE

our services

Telephone Number

Message Us Now

Address Location

Expert Service at
the Supreme Court Press